I spent yesterday going through my closet and getting rid of suits, shirts, ties, sweaters and anything that no longer fit or had served its purpose over the years. I gave them to Good Will and felt good about it.
I was walking into Walmart and gave to the Salvation Army guy with the red bucket some money and felt good about it. Their commercials on TV are especially heartbreaking and it all appears to being going to a good cause.
I was standing in line at Walmart and noticed a young boy buying Pop Tarts behind me and I watched him pulling out his tiny, little wallet to pay for it and I told the lady to put it on my bill. My mind had stories of him eating these for breakfast and "there is no food at home" so I paid for it. It may or not have been true but I felt good about it. He stood in awe and shook my hand and wished me a Merry Christmas.
I had dinner with friends and I bought a bouquet of flowers and a chocolate cake. I felt good about it. They cooked a delicious meal and we are truly good friends. It is mutual respect and kindness and I didn't feel obligated but happy to do so.
I am also serving a 10 day Vipassana course next week. I donate my time and energy and I feel good about it. It is a "selfless" type of giving to people you don't know and I seem to "get" more out of it than they do.
"I feel good about it" seems to be the theme for my giving. It seems I am "giving" for reasons that do not seem to be from a place of neutrality. Meaning there seems to another "hidden agenda" hiding and lurking underneath my extended hand. I wanted to know my intention and purpose of my "giving" and how it came to be so "me" centered.
Elizabeth Gilbert writes in the December's issue and article called, "Confessions of an Over-giver" in O Magazine:
"Now, over-giving is not quite the same thing as generosity. Generosity is neither entangling nor aggressive, because the generous person doesn't expect anything in return. The over-giver doesn't expect anything in return, either--except to be petted and feted and praised and loved unconditionally for the rest of time (and maybe you'll even stand up at my funeral and tell everyone what a wonderful person I was) so that's not emotionally loaded. Nothing toxic there!"
...."Years ago, in India, a monk warned me, "Never give anyone more than they are emotionally capable of receiving, or they will have no choice but to hate you for it" At the time, the advice sounded cynical, even cruel. It certainly flew in the face of Christianity's highest charitable ideals, as famously expressed by Mother Teresa: "Give until it hurts." But these days, I've come to believe that when you give heedlessly or with an agenda, you actually can give until it hurts, and that person who is most gravely injured in the exchange is the other guy."
I honestly never thought of it that way. It seemed counter intuitive and in direct opposition to the way I was raised. In hindsight I had learned to give to family members that were "struggling" and "having a hard time" as my mother so clearly and aptly pointed out. It seemed like I could also win "approval" from her by doing so.
I was also covering up for my parents lack of "parenting skills" and it was my "job" to give until it "hurts" and/or so I could win their approval as a "giving and loving" son.
I am the guilty party here.
I could have said no. It might have served everybody in the long run. They could have found their "path" and "got" their lessons without my over-giving and for me to "feel good about it" attitude. And in the end nothing really changed.
I am going to give from a place of "neutrality" and without a selfish agenda and I am more than willing to allow you or anybody to "get" the lessons that we all have come to the Earth to learn.
I won't be mean about it, but I may do nothing in the way of "over-giving" and honor your chosen path. It's the way I learned to "give" to myself and others and learned to become self empowered in the process.
I more than likely will still give to others. It will come from a place of generosity.